JD Case Study · Target

Sr Manager, REDcard Loyalty & Engagement

Where
Brooklyn Park, MN · hybrid
Pays
$188K–$324K

Owns REDcard lifecycle marketing — activation, usage, retention — for a co-brand loyalty program that drives a large share of Target sales. This is the co-brand cardholder lifecycle engine I built for the Synchrony case study, pointed at a single, very large program.

One kind of number here. The analysis below runs on illustrative figures invented to show method. No Target data is used or implied; the operating logic is the deliverable.

What they’re actually buying

Turn a perk into measurable incremental sales

Grow REDcard engagement and the spend it drives. Move activation, frequency, and retention through lifecycle marketing and measurement — and prove each move turned into incremental sales, not just usage. The job is turning a loyalty perk into measurable, defensible top-line.

The first 90 days

Map the lifecycle, diagnose, test

The order matters. Nobody should change a system they haven’t reconciled, and nobody should present a verdict before the numbers under it can be trusted.

Days 1–30

Map the REDcard lifecycle

Baseline the enroll → activate → habitual-usage → retain funnel and the engagement KPIs. Meet Loyalty, Marketing, and Analytics, and find the highest-leverage drop-off.

Days 31–60

Stand up engagement diagnostics

Ship a REDcard engagement dashboard with segmentation (new vs. lapsing vs. power users) and size the top two or three engagement opportunities in incremental sales.

Days 61–90

Run a lifecycle test

Design a test/control on an activation or value-prop hypothesis, deliver the incrementality readout, and set the experimentation cadence for the loyalty program.

Signature analysis · illustrative data

Signature analysis: the co-brand loyalty lifecycle

Where I’d aim first: activated→habitual. Enrollment is easy; the value comes from members who reach for the card every trip. A test/control on the activation nudge that lifts the habitual rate compounds through retention and share-of-wallet — and it’s cleanly measurable against a holdout.

Which engagement step unlocks the most REDcard spend?Indexed to the first stage

Enrolled100indexed to 100
Activated (first 5%-off use)71
Habitual (uses every trip)44
Retained 12 months38
Advocate / multi-channel22the share-of-wallet base
Illustrative figures — a co-brand loyalty lifecycle with the engagement unlock identified and framed for an incrementality test.

Requirement → proof

The posting, answered line by line

Each line of the posting against something already built and running on this site. Where the fit is a ramp rather than a match, the row says so.

The same engine

This is the same co-brand lifecycle engine as my Synchrony case study — enroll → activate → habitual → retain, with test/control underneath — pointed at one large loyalty program. Acquisition or loyalty, lease or card, the machine doesn’t change: find the drop-off, test the fix, prove the incremental sales.

See the Synchrony lifecycle case study →

Loyalty analytics that proves incremental sales — not just usage — is what I’ve already shipped. Let’s talk about REDcard engagement. — Paul Brown